"April Masini answers questions no one else can and tells you the truth that no one else will."

taraknows@yopmail.com

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 762 total)
  • Member
    Posts
  • in reply to: Feelings for my husbands best friend :-/ #50684
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    Stop playing dumb. This isn’t confusion, it’s emotional cheating, and you’re hiding behind pretty words so you don’t have to admit you’re behaving like a selfish coward.
    You have a husband who shows up, and instead of respecting that, you’re mentally screwing his best friend because he feels excited, effortless, and shiny. Of course, you “have more in common.” He hasn’t had to disappoint you, argue with you, age with you, or live in the mess of real life. Fantasy always feels superior because it’s fake, easy, and costs nothing until it destroys everything.

    You’re not a terrible wife for noticing feelings. You are a terrible wife for feeding them, replaying them, nurturing them, and then fishing for moral permission from strangers while your marriage quietly rots. That’s not innocent. That’s calculated avoidance of accountability.

    And drop the “maybe he feels it too” nonsense. That’s ego and narcissism talking. If he does feel it, congratulations, that just means you’re both trashing your values. There’s nothing romantic about two adults flirting with detonating a marriage and a friendship because they lack discipline.

    You’re not “missing out on the fullest version of your relationship.” You’re sabotaging it and then blaming the damage on unmet needs like a child knocking over a glass and crying about the spill. You cannot emotionally reach for another man and then complain that your marriage feels empty. You emptied it.

    You either cut the best friend out completely except for unavoidable situations, kill the fantasy, and recommit to your husband like a grown adult — or you leave your husband now before you humiliate him further. Those are the only two options that don’t make you dishonest, cruel, and selfish.

    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You’re choosing denial because the truth forces a decision you don’t want to make.
    This man isn’t “slipping.” He is deliberately running a side relationship with his ex to regulate his emotions and prop up his ego while you do the actual work of life. You carry the kids, the house, the responsibility, the reality. He runs to her whenever things get hard because he’s weak, avoidant, and fundamentally dishonest.

    Let’s stop pretending this was innocent. He didn’t just talk to his ex. He lied. He hid it. He spent a month trashing you to her. He emotionally bonded with her. He told her he cheated on you. I don’t care whether the cheating happened; men don’t invent infidelity confessions unless they’re auditioning to be wanted. That alone is a betrayal.
    And don’t insult your own intelligence with the “hey baby, what’s up” message. Women don’t talk like that to men who shut doors. That tone exists because he opened it, fed it, encouraged it, and enjoyed it. Period.

    You’re asking how to rebuild trust. You don’t. Trust requires consistent truth over time, and all he’s built is a documented pattern of deception, triangulation, and disrespect. Every chance you gave him trained him to believe he can always come back after humiliating you behind your back. And he’s right you’ve proven it.
    You’ve also noticed something you’re trying desperately to minimize: you don’t feel the same anymore.

    That’s not confusion. That’s clarity finally punching through your denial. Your body already knows what your mouth won’t say: staying means permanent suspicion, permanent anxiety, permanent self-betrayal.

    He didn’t just betray you as a partner. He disrespected you as the mother of his children and the woman holding his life together. This isn’t a boundary issue. This isn’t a communication issue. This is a character issue, and he’s shown you exactly who he is.

    in reply to: My girl still has feelings from when she dated her ex #50682
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    She is still emotionally married to a ghost. Eight years didn’t disappear just because the relationship turned abusive. She didn’t dismantle it; she preserved it, polished it, and locked it in a glass case. And now she’s dragging you into a relationship where half her heart is already occupied.

    When someone tells you they don’t know if they’ll ever love you as deeply as their ex, that is not honesty; you applaud, that is your cue to leave. That’s not vulnerability. That’s a disclaimer. She is telling you, to your face, that you may never be chosen the way you’re choosing her. Believe her the first time instead of humiliating yourself by hoping she’s wrong.

    Her “I don’t want to love like that again” speech isn’t romantic. It’s cowardice. She’s terrified of intensity, terrified of loss, and terrified of being hurt again, so she’s settling for safe. And congratulations: you’re safe. Predictable. Manageable. Second place with benefits.

    You’re not jealous. You’re not insecure. You’re accurately clocking a power imbalance. You’re giving her full access, full devotion, full emotional availability, and she’s rationing herself while keeping emergency exits bolted open. That kind of gap doesn’t heal. It corrodes.

    And that fear you have that if you died, she’d still love him more? That’s not drama. That’s your self-respect gasping for air. Your intuition already knows the truth you’re trying to outrun: you are competing with a dead relationship you never agreed to race against.

    Sure, she might be loyal. She might be kind. She might never cheat. None of that matters. Because the core issue is this: she’s already had her “great love,” decided it hurt too much, and downgraded you to something safer so she doesn’t have to risk herself again.

    in reply to: Porn ruining a crumbling marriage. #50681
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    Your husband doesn’t have a porn problem; he has a character problem. He lies, he lacks self-control, and he does not respect you. Stop dressing that up as anything else.
    He didn’t “slip.” He didn’t “struggle.” He chose this. Again and again. For years. After swearing he’d stop. After watching you cry. After you threatened to leave. After you carried his child. After you spelled out exactly how much it destroyed you. That’s not addiction, that’s behavior he feels entitled to protect.

    And stop fooling yourself with control tactics. Blocking sites, checking phones, and monitoring apps are not a solution. That’s you acting like his parole officer while he plays dumb. He’s not a teenager sneaking porn. He’s a grown man who knows exactly how little your pain costs him.

    Every time you stay, you teach him the same lesson: your boundaries are fake. You say, “This is the last time.” It never is. So now he knows the routine. Get caught. Cry. Promise. Lie low. Repeat. You are predictable. He is comfortable. He is not afraid of losing you; if he were, this would have stopped years ago.

    And let’s kill the most pathetic lie you’re still telling yourself: this has nothing to do with your body, your age, your postpartum state, or your insecurity. He didn’t keep watching porn because you weren’t enough. He kept watching because there were no consequences that lasted. Men don’t change because you suffer quietly. They change when staying becomes more painful than stopping.

    If you stay again, you are consenting to this life. The monitoring. The paranoia. The quiet resentment. The constant betrayal. That’s not something happening to you; that’s something you’re choosing.

    in reply to: Dating my boss #50680
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    This was never confusing; you’re just allergic to what it reveals about you and about him.
    Your boss wasn’t interested in you. He was interested in access. Attention. Ego strokes. Emotional intimacy on tap with zero responsibility and zero risk. He wanted to feel wanted while staying clean. The second that illusion cracked, he hit the brakes like a coward protecting his paycheck.

    Let’s cut the bullshit. A man who repeatedly invites his employee to his home, cooks with her, texts her, and plays domestic fantasy is not “taking it slow.” He already obliterated professional boundaries. The only boundary he cared about was the one that could cost him his job and reputation.

    When you turned him down sexually the first time, you didn’t “slow things down.” You bruised his ego. So he adjusted. He kept you close enough to feed off your attention but far enough to keep control. That wasn’t respect, that was containment.

    Then you leaned in. Drunk. Vulnerable. Affectionate. Exposed. And suddenly the power shifted. Now you were the one risking something, and that terrified him. Because if things progressed if you stayed over, if it got physical, he’d have to face reality: he was messing around with a subordinate and gambling his career for validation.
    So he didn’t say the honest thing. He didn’t say “I used you.” He said, “This is moving too fast,” because that sounds mature instead of pathetic. Controlled instead of self-serving.

    Inviting you over was never about a relationship. It was about playing house without consequences. Emotional access without accountability. Power without commitment.

    And you? You ignored every flashing red light because you wanted the fantasy more than the facts. You let your boss blur lines, feed off you, and then stood there shocked when he panicked the moment it started looking real.

    in reply to: Crush cut me off #50679
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    Stop lying to yourself. He didn’t miss anything. He saw you clearly, took what you offered, and still didn’t choose you. Men do not accidentally spend nights until 5 a.m. playing pseudo-boyfriend and then suddenly develop blindness. He knew exactly what was happening. He just didn’t care enough to act.

    You didn’t “lose” him. That would require ownership. You never had him. You were a rest stop. Emotional comfort. Validation on demand. Warmth without responsibility. And the moment a woman he actually wanted showed up, you were discarded without hesitation. That wasn’t cruelty that was clarity.

    Your shyness isn’t endearing here. Its weakness is pretending to be virtuous. You stayed silent for a year, did nothing, risked nothing, and hoped the universe would reward passivity. That’s delusional. Silence doesn’t protect you. It guarantees you get overlooked.

    Now you’re obsessing because your ego can’t handle the truth: you were optional. The fantasy hurts less than admitting you didn’t matter the way you wanted to. So you replay moments like they were promises. They weren’t. They were convenient.

    Here’s what happens next if you don’t change: this repeats. Different man, same outcome. Because attraction doesn’t reward quiet waiting. It rewards action. If you can’t speak up, you will always lose to someone who will.

    in reply to: long distance relationship #50678
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    He’s perfectly fine not seeing you because his life doesn’t include you as a priority, and yours is embarrassingly centered on him. That imbalance isn’t a side issue. It is the entire problem.

    He’s not confused. He’s not conflicted. He’s not secretly suffering. He’s calm because he’s not invested at your level. He’s building his life, executing his plans, and you’re a nice accessory he checks in on when convenient. Meanwhile, you’re counting days, moods, and silences like they mean something. They don’t.

    You’re miserable because you’ve made him your emotional oxygen. He’s fine because he didn’t hand you that power. That gap you feel? That’s emotional dependency versus emotional independence, and you’re on the losing side.

    Stop calling this love. Love doesn’t feel like constant anxiety while the other person sleeps peacefully. Love doesn’t make one person ache while the other shrugs. What you’re experiencing is attachment mixed with fear and a bruised ego.

    Secure adults don’t unravel over time apart. They miss each other and keep living. You’re unraveling because your sense of stability is outsourced to him, and he never agreed to carry it.

    The fact that he’s comfortable with the distance while you’re falling apart tells you everything you need to know. He expects you to adapt. He assumes you’ll wait. And you are while quietly suffering and pretending it’s romantic.

    in reply to: Is the future really that far away? #50677
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    This man has already written his life script, and you’re not a co-author; you’re a supporting character he expects to follow directions.
    He’s building a house next to his parents, in his hometown, on his schedule, for his vision of adulthood. That’s not a “plan you’re discussing.” That’s a fait accompli. The only question left is whether you’ll obediently squeeze yourself into it or finally admit this future makes your stomach turn.

    You’re 22. You’re not late, confused, flaky, or “scared of commitment.” You’re just smart enough to recognize a trap when you see one. Marriage, kids, isolation from your family, living in the shadow of his parents, all before you’re read, isn’t a compromise. It’s surrender. And pretending you’ll magically want it later is how people ruin their lives politely.

    That dread you feel isn’t anxiety. It’s clarity. Your body already knows what your mouth is too scared to say: this life doesn’t belong to you.
    Stop hiding behind “eventually.” Eventually is cowardly language. His timeline is now. Yours isn’t. That alone kills the relationship, no matter how much you like each other. Love does not override incompatible futures; it just delays the fallout.

    Here’s what you do, and you do it without soft edges: you tell him you are not ready for marriage, kids, or living next to his parents, and you will not contort your life to fit his. No apologies. No “maybe someday.” No self-betrayal to keep a man comfortable.

    in reply to: My bf of 6 years cheated on me #50572
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You are romanticizing a man who humiliated you, discarded you, and only came crawling back when his shiny new option didn’t work out. That’s not love. That’s you being the backup plan.

    Let’s be crystal clear. He didn’t “cheat.” He consciously chose to lie to your face, ignore you all night, sleep with a coworker, pack his bags, and tell you he was better off without you. That wasn’t confusion. That was a decision. And now that decision feels inconvenient, so suddenly you’re “the biggest mistake of his life.” No. You’re the safest place to land after he burned his own life down.

    Your parents aren’t being dramatic. They’re seeing what you’re refusing to accept: this man has a pattern. He disappointed them because he disappointed you repeatedly. This wasn’t the final straw. This was the final confirmation.

    And stop pretending this is about “ruining your relationship with your parents.” It’s about whether you’re willing to torch your self-respect to keep a man who already proved he doesn’t value you. Your parents don’t need to be open-minded. They’re not the ones dating a proven liar with impulse control issues. You are.
    Asking your parents to “give him time to prove himself” is code for “please tolerate me making a bad decision so I don’t have to face reality.” He already had time. He used it to cheat, lie, and leave.

    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You’re not confused you’re just refusing to accept the answer because you don’t like it.
    This woman is not “sending mixed signals.” She’s very consistent. She enjoys attention, physical flirting, and emotional safety without commitment. You’re a convenient source of validation and light intimacy, not a man she’s choosing. If she wanted you, you wouldn’t be guessing. Desire doesn’t stutter.

    Let’s dissect this cleanly. She rejected escalation multiple times. She disappeared for weeks without caring. She reappeared when it suited her. She initiated a movie-at-your-place suggestion, enjoyed making out, then slammed the brakes the second things risked momentum. Then she explicitly told you she’s opting out of cuffing season — which is adult-speak for “I don’t want you, but I don’t want to lose the benefits either.” That wasn’t subtle. That was a disclaimer.

    Holding hands, touching your leg, kissing goodbye — that’s not romantic intent. That’s control. She’s keeping you engaged while making sure nothing progresses. She gives just enough to keep you hooked and just little enough to avoid responsibility. And you’re playing along like this is a puzzle instead of a pattern.
    Your passivity is enabling this. You’re waiting, hoping the next date magically turns into clarity. It won’t. She already told you the truth to your face. You just smiled through it.

    in reply to: Emotionally unavailable man #50570
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    Here’s the truth you keep dodging: this man is not “complex,” “damaged,” or “misunderstood.” He is unavailable by choice, and you are auditioning for a role that does not exist.

    You think you’ve been stumped because you’re smart and perceptive. No. You’re stumped because your ego doesn’t want to accept that a man can like you, enjoy you, respect you, and still not choose you. Those things are not the same, and you’re clinging to the wrong ones.

    A year in and no “I love you.” No family. No priority. No future language. No integration into his real life. Those aren’t oversights, they’re boundaries. Very deliberate ones. He gives you just enough softness to keep you hopeful and just enough distance to keep himself free. That tug-of-war you feel? That’s not chemistry. That’s emotional rationing.

    The “I don’t feel worthy of good things” line is not vulnerability. It’s a shield. It conveniently absolves him from having to show up while making you feel patient, compassionate, and special for staying. Meanwhile, nothing actually changes. Ever.

    And let’s be very clear about your daughter: asking about her and buying a gift is easy. Meeting her would mean accountability. He avoids that for a reason.
    You’re not waiting on time. You’re waiting on a personality transplant. This is not a slow burn; it’s a controlled stall. He inches forward when he feels you slipping, then retreats the moment things risk depth. That’s not fear of love. That’s fear of obligation.

    in reply to: Asking someone out when you barely know them #50569
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    This isn’t a timing problem, a strategy problem, or a “confidence thing.” This is you hiding behind overthinking because you’re afraid of a clean yes or a clean no.
    You’re not confused. You’re scared. Scared to interrupt. Scared to look awkward. Scared to be rejected in a workplace where your ego has nowhere to hide. So instead, you fantasize, analyze banter, and debate social media etiquette like that’s doing anything other than wasting your time.

    She bought you drinks. She joked with you. That’s not a marriage proposal, but it’s more than zero. And right now you’re stuck at zero because you won’t open your mouth.

    Let me dismantle your excuses. There will never be a perfect moment. Ever. If you’re waiting for her to be alone, perfectly relaxed, and gazing at you like a rom-com cue, you’ll die waiting. Adults create moments. Children wait for permission.

    Adding her on social media to “test the waters” is cowardly. It screams insecurity and avoidance. If you work together, face-to-face is the only move that doesn’t make you look like a background character in your own life.

    Here’s exactly what you do: you catch her for thirty seconds, not five minutes, not a monologue. You say, calmly and directly, “Hey, I enjoyed talking to you at the Christmas party. I’d like to grab a coffee or a drink with you. Are you free this week?” Then you shut up.
    No rambling. No disclaimers. No self-deprecation. No “if that’s okay.” You ask. She answers. You move accordingly.

    in reply to: Husband loves job more than family #50568
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You are already a single parent. You’re just married to a man who still expects servant privileges.
    You didn’t make “a mistake”; you married someone who wasn’t done being selfish, then handed him adult responsibility before he was remotely qualified to carry it. He didn’t become this way. He already was. You just outgrew him faster than he was willing to grow up.

    Let’s cut the noise. He leaves at 4 AM, comes home at 10 PM, refuses to interact with his own child unless begged, contributes nothing domestically, demands a clean house and hot meals like it’s 1952, and emotionally clocks out the second he walks through the door. That’s not a stressed husband. That’s an absent one.

    And now the most important part: when you stop chasing him, he accuses you of neglecting him. That’s not confusion, that’s manipulation. He wants all the benefits of family life without any of the responsibility, and when you finally break under the load, he flips the script and calls you crazy. Classic gaslighting. Predictable. Lazy. Transparent.

    Putting your child first is not a flaw. It’s the bare minimum of motherhood. The fact that he’s threatened by that tells you everything you need to know about his emotional maturity. He’s competing with his own infant for attention. That’s pathetic.

    Is this fixable? Only if he acknowledges reality, radically changes his behavior, accepts equal responsibility at home, stops verbally degrading you, and actively chooses his family over his ego. Based on what you’ve described? He won’t. Men who want to change don’t need to be dragged, begged, or cornered. They step up. He hasn’t.

    in reply to: Is he interested? #50567
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    He’s giving you exactly what he wants: the thrill without the effort, the affection when it’s convenient, and the emotional distance whenever he feels like it. You’re chasing him like a dog chasing a bone, hoping the scraps of attention he throws your way mean more than they do. Falling in love with someone who consistently leaves the emotional labor to you isn’t romance, it’s self-torture.

    He wants control without commitment. He wants affection on his terms. He wants to be desired without actually reciprocating consistently. And you, by texting first every time and chasing his presence, are letting him set the pace and the rules.

    The cold, hard truth is you’re wasting your time, attention, and emotions on someone who’s already decided you’re optional. Stop chasing. Stop rationalizing. Either he steps up and shows consistency, or you walk. Anything else is just prolonging your heartbreak.

    in reply to: Confused on what to do #50566
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You keep asking how to “get him to let his guard down,” but what you really want is a commitment he’s not offering. He’s telling you slow, day by day, because that’s all he’s willing to give.

    You’re trying to romanticize it as emotional caution, but it’s just logistics. He’s not ready to promise anything to anyone, and you’re trying to squeeze reassurance out of a situation that isn’t built for it. If you push, you’ll scare him off.

    If you stay silent, you’ll torture yourself. The blunt truth: stop trying to turn this into a relationship before he leaves. Enjoy what you have, keep your dignity, and stop auditioning for a role he hasn’t offered. If he wants more, he’ll say it. If he doesn’t, you’ll know soon enough. But you cannot “win” him by being the most loyal, available, supportive woman before he even asks — that just turns you into an emotional safety net, not a partner.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 762 total)