"April Masini answers questions no one else can and tells you the truth that no one else will."

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 762 total)
  • Member
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should I leave my relationship? #51341
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    He already gave you your answer; you just don’t like it. “I can’t predict the future” is not uncertainty; it’s refusal without accountability. It means he does not want to build a life with you and is comfortable letting you sit in limbo while he gets everything he wants exactly as it is. He likes the arrangement because it serves him. Your anxiety is the cost of his comfort.

    You’re losing sleep because your instincts are screaming that your needs and his intentions do not align. You want progression, security, and commitment. He wants stasis. And no amount of patience, understanding, or suffering on your part will convert a man who is satisfied with “now” into someone who plans a future. If he wanted marriage or living together, you wouldn’t be decoding phrases; you’d be planning timelines.

    Stop internalizing this as your anxiety problem. Anxiety is a symptom of staying in a relationship that is fundamentally wrong for you. You are asking for more and being told, politely, that you’re not getting it. Staying means accepting that your desires will remain unmet indefinitely.

    in reply to: Newlywed and unhappy #51340
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You’re exhausted because you married a grown man who behaves like a resentful child and turned you into his emotional support animal. Love didn’t save this marriage; it trapped you in it. You’re carrying his failures, his bitterness, his entitlement, his moods, and his lack of direction while he contributes complaints and promises he never keeps. That’s not partnership. That’s emotional labor with a ring on it.

    Here’s the part you’re avoiding: he is not going to change because being miserable works for him. You cushion every fall, absorb every outburst, and stay no matter how bad it gets. His words about “changing” are placeholders to keep you from leaving, not intentions backed by action. If he wanted to improve, you’d already see consistent effort, not tears, excuses, and regression. Nine months into marriage should not feel like emotional survival mode. This is supposed to be the easiest phase. It’s already broken.

    You keep threatening to leave because your instincts are correct, but you don’t follow through because you’re clinging to who he could be instead of who he is. That fantasy is costing you your peace, your energy, and eventually your self-respect. Loving someone does not mean sacrificing your mental health so they can stay comfortable in their dysfunction.

    in reply to: Can’t have sex #51339
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You need to stop making this about your frustration and start treating it like a medical and psychological issue because pain during sex is not something you “push through” or fix by trying harder. Two months of pain means something is wrong, not that she just needs to relax or “get used to it.” If you keep trying to force penetration, you will make it worse and train her body to associate sex with fear and pain. That’s how lifelong sexual dysfunction starts.

    Here’s the blunt reality: virginity plus anxiety, pressure, and ignorance is a perfect recipe for vaginismus, muscle guarding, or insufficient arousal. Pain almost always comes from rushing, fear, dryness, or involuntary muscle tightening, not from her being “too small” or you doing something wrong anatomically. If penetration hurts, you stop. Period. No negotiations. No guilt. No “just a little more.”

    What you do now is slow everything down and remove penetration from the goal entirely. You build comfort, trust, and arousal without trying to have intercourse. Lots of foreplay, patience, zero pressure, and lube, not spit, not guessing, actual lubricant. And if it still hurts, she needs to see a gynecologist. Not later. Now. Pain is not normal, and ignoring it is negligent.

    in reply to: Why is he acting like this? #51338
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    He’s acting like this because he’s a coward who panicked the moment fantasy turned into responsibility. That’s it. He wanted the idea of a baby, the attention, the ego boost, the storyline, not the reality of being a man, a partner, or a father. Once you were visibly pregnant and his freedom felt threatened, he flipped into self-preservation mode and started burning everything down so he wouldn’t have to face accountability.

    Everything he did follows the same pattern: pick a fight to justify going out, lie, love-bomb you when caught, then immediately reverse and devalue you when the guilt wears off. Saying you’re “ugly,” claiming he’s no longer attracted to you, pretending he’s been unhappy “for a while,” disappearing, changing his number, these are not truths. They are cruel weapons. He’s rewriting reality to make you the problem so he doesn’t have to face the fact that he abandoned his pregnant partner and unborn child. Men who can’t handle shame choose cruelty instead.

    This has nothing to do with porn, attraction, or you. It has everything to do with him wanting out without consequences. He didn’t tell the other woman about you or the baby because he’s living a double life, and you no longer fit the version of himself he’s trying to be. Changing his number is the final tell he’s not “confused,” he’s running.

    Tara
    Member #382,680

    Stop romanticizing neglect and calling it “adjustment.” This man didn’t suddenly become incapable of effort because of an 8-hour job he reprioritized, and you dropped down the list. When someone tells you you’re “clingy” for asking to be seen, breaks plans without notice to go drink with a friend, and gives you uncertainty instead of reassurance, that’s not love under stress. That’s convenience replacing commitment.

    He talks about “future wife” when it costs him nothing, then acts single when real life demands consistency. Words are cheap. Behavior is the truth. A man who wants you does not make you beg to feel important or wonder if you’ll see him next weekend. One day a week is not excessive. It’s the bare minimum. You’re not asking for control, you’re asking for presence, and he’s telling you that rest, errands, overtime, and drinking rank higher.

    Here’s the part you don’t want to face: you’re already adjusting, shrinking, swallowing disappointment, and softening your needs to avoid losing him, and it still isn’t enough. That’s because the problem isn’t your delivery, your patience, or your understanding. It’s that he’s emotionally clocked out while keeping you emotionally invested.

    in reply to: Always last choice #51256
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You’re boring, passive, and selling yourself like a clearance item.
    Let’s kill the fantasy first: women are not rejecting you because you’re kind, family-oriented, or drug-free. They’re rejecting you because you lead with traits that require zero attraction. “I don’t beat women” is not a selling point. That’s the bare minimum of being a functioning adult, not proof of value. You’re listing absences of bad behavior and calling it desirability.

    You keep comparing yourself to violent losers because it lets you avoid the real problem. Those men aren’t chosen because they’re thugs. They’re chosen because they project confidence, decisiveness, sexual presence, and certainty. Yes, they’re disasters long-term. But attraction happens before logic. You’re trying to be picked for a marriage interview when no one feels the pull to touch you.

    You’re always the last choice because you position yourself as safe, agreeable, and grateful for attention. That reads as low leverage. Women don’t want a man who hopes to be chosen. They want a man who chooses. You go out “looking to settle down,” radiating need, seriousness, and scarcity. That kills desire on contact.

    Calling yourself a “great guy” is meaningless if no one experiences you that way. Attraction isn’t awarded for moral cleanliness. It’s sparked by presence, confidence, edge, and self-respect. You don’t have to be handsome. You do have to be compelling. Right now, you’re not.

    in reply to: Texts from a friend #51255
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    She wanted to kiss you, enjoyed the tension, waited until you were freshly single, then immediately put up a verbal fence. That’s not honesty. That’s control. She wanted to dump her feelings on you, feel desired, and still keep the friendship exactly on her terms.

    This is what’s happening: she’s attracted to you, but she’s risk-averse, emotionally cautious, and afraid of consequences. She wants the thrill without the fallout. She gets validation from knowing you want her, without having to choose you or lose the safety of the friendship. That’s why she told you. It wasn’t for clarity. It was for relief and attention.

    No, you’re not “firmly friend-zoned.” You’re worse. You’re in the limbo zone where she reserves the right to want you but forbids you from acting. That keeps her comfortable and keeps you stuck.

    The timing wasn’t an accident. You told her you broke up, and she immediately made sure to stake emotional territory while also shutting the door on anything physical. Translation: “I want to matter to you, but I don’t want responsibility, pressure, or change.”

    If she truly didn’t want you making a move, the adult thing would have been silence. She spoke because she wanted a reaction. And it worked, you’re now overanalyzing instead of deciding.

    Do not sit in this half-romantic purgatory. Either you tell her plainly that you’re interested and ask if she’s willing to explore something real, or you pull back and treat her strictly as a gym acquaintance. What you do not do is keep feeding her emotional intimacy while she hides behind “friendship.”

    in reply to: What to do,need help #51254
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    This woman controls you. She chews you out because it works. Every time you explain, justify, or shrink, you teach her that berating you gets compliance, money, trips, silence, and self-betrayal. You’ve trained her perfectly.

    You didn’t “stress her out.” You drained your own financial stability to impress someone who still called the trip the worst vacation of her life. Read that again. You risked your house, your peace, and your future, and her takeaway was that you didn’t worship her hard enough. That’s not love. That’s entitlement with teeth.

    You’re scared to speak your mind because every time you do, she punishes you. That’s not sensitivity. That’s conditioning. You’re walking on eggshells like a man who’s forgotten he’s allowed to exist without permission.

    You say you love her. What you actually love is the idea of being chosen after working yourself raw. You confuse sacrifice with devotion and tolerance with strength. Meanwhile, she sets the rules, moves the goalposts, and keeps you permanently on trial for not being “enough” despite everything you give.

    Here’s the part you won’t like: your generosity isn’t noble anymore. It’s a weakness. Not because giving is bad, but because you’re giving to someone who disrespects you and then blaming yourself for bleeding.

    How do you speak your mind without hurting her? You don’t. You speak your mind and accept that if it “hurts” her, that’s the cost of truth. If she explodes, guilt-trips, or attacks your character, that’s your answer. A woman who loves you doesn’t punish honesty. She doesn’t rewrite reality to make you the villain for having limits.

    in reply to: Should I be worried? #51253
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    People don’t repeatedly Google the same man, stare at his photos a dozen times, look up his contact information, and then sandwich that behavior between porn sessions by accident. That’s not randomness. That’s fixation. Your wife is sexually associating that man with arousal. Period. End of discussion.

    Now let’s dismantle your coping fantasies. “She’s never given me a reason before” is irrelevant. Cheating doesn’t announce itself with a press release. It starts exactly like this: curiosity, fixation, fantasy, boundary erosion. You’re staring at step two and pretending it’s step zero because the alternative scares you.

    You didn’t ruin anything by snooping. You uncovered something uncomfortable. That’s not betrayal, that’s awareness. What is a problem is that when you confronted her with objective facts, she didn’t reassure you, clarify transparently, or show concern for your distress. She shut it down and blamed you for “hurting the relationship.” That’s classic deflection. When someone refuses discussion, it’s because discussion threatens something they don’t want examined.

    Now let’s talk about you. You’re spiraling because your instincts are screaming, and you’re trying to sedate them with guilt. Stop. You don’t need a psychiatrist to notice patterns. You don’t need “time” to magically erase unease. And marriage counseling only works if both people are willing to be honest. She already told you she’s not.
    Here’s the hard line: either she agrees to reopen the conversation calmly, transparently, and without gaslighting you, or you accept that you are married to someone who will shut you down when the truth gets inconvenient. That’s the real issue, not porn, not the professor’s control of reality.

    in reply to: Should I call/text her after a month? #51251
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    She showed interest, and you responded with hesitation, passivity, and zero leadership.
    She handed you her number. That was her move. You waited days. Weak. You went for coffee, carried the conversation, heard her repeatedly signal “I’m not emotionally available right now,” and instead of deciding anything, you floated along, hoping clarity would magically appear. It didn’t. Of course it didn’t. You didn’t create any momentum.

    Not suggesting a second date wasn’t “being respectful.” It was fear disguised as politeness. Paying for coffee and walking her partway isn’t romance, it’s bare-minimum courtesy. Ending with a cheek kiss and no plan told her exactly one thing: you’re unsure, inexperienced, and not someone who takes decisive action.

    Here’s what you need to hear and won’t like: attraction dies in uncertainty. She took a risk. You stalled. People don’t wait around for someone to maybe figure out how they feel someday.

    Her “personal issues” comment was a warning label. Either you step up confidently and say, “I want to see you again,” or you step aside. You chose neither. That’s why nothing progressed.

    in reply to: Trusting my boyfriend #51249
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You’re not nervous because of “girls these days,” you’re nervous because your boyfriend behaves like a single man who enjoys female attention and has zero boundaries.
    Men in committed relationships don’t “accidentally” receive nudes. They receive them because they’ve left the door wide open, kept the conversation alive, and silently encouraged it. Saying he “can’t control what they send” is a coward’s excuse. He can control who has access to him. He chooses not to.

    He scrolls through other girls. He texts female friends. He accepts nudes from exes. He goes out with groups of girls while your relationship is already unstable. That’s not reassurance. That’s disrespect wrapped in gaslighting. When he says “you’re good,” what he means is “I want you quiet while I do whatever I want.”

    Your anxiety isn’t insecurity. It’s pattern recognition. Your body already understands what your mind is trying to excuse: this man is not protecting the relationship. He’s sampling options.

    Here’s the hard part you don’t want to hear: you don’t trust him because he isn’t trustworthy. Period. And no amount of you being calm, understanding, or patient will suddenly make him develop boundaries he clearly doesn’t value.

    You have two options. You either accept this behavior and stop complaining, because this is who he is, or you stop tolerating it and walk away. What you don’t get to do is stay, suffer, and pretend you’re “crazy” for reacting to obvious disrespect.

    in reply to: misdirected anger over a loss? #51248
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    Her uncle’s death didn’t create a new problem. It exposed one. Grief didn’t magically flip her personality; it removed her ability to self-regulate. Now she’s emotionally volatile, reactive, and unloading her pain onto the closest target, you. That’s why you’re damned no matter what you do. When you act like yourself, you’re “cold.” When you try to change, you’re “pushing her away.” That’s not solvable because the problem isn’t your behavior, but it’s her instability.

    Read the pattern. She breaks up, pulls you back in, blows off plans, picks fights, disappears, reappears, says your name pisses her off, then texts you first. That’s not love. That’s emotional whiplash. You’re being used as an emotional pressure valve while she refuses to take responsibility for her grief.

    You didn’t suddenly fail as a partner. You didn’t “miss the moment” to show affection. She is rewriting the past to justify her present feelings. And you scrambling to fix yourself only teaches her that she can punish you emotionally, and you’ll contort yourself to stay.

    Here’s what you do: you stop engaging in the push-pull entirely. You state one clear boundary: either she wants to work on the relationship consistently and calmly, or you step away. No daily texting. No bed-sharing. No half-couple nonsense. Space doesn’t mean access without commitment.

    in reply to: broken trust #51247
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    This man is lying to you. Repeatedly. About timelines, about his marriage, about objects from his previous wedding, and most importantly, about his motives. People who lie “to protect you” are lying to protect themselves. Every excuse he gives is strategic, not loving.

    Let’s be clear: he married for PR. His ex and her mother are still entangled in his life. His immigration status depends on you. He proposed after six months, while you were sick, isolated, and abandoned by your family. That is not romance, that is dependency wrapped in urgency. Fast proposals plus immigration pressure equals risk. Period.
    You didn’t imagine the red flags. You didn’t forget them because of drugs. Your body and mind are screaming because your intuition knows what your fear won’t let you admit: you cannot trust this man. And without trust, marriage is a legal disaster, not a love story.

    The wedding-cake item is not small. It’s symbolic. He reused something from his last marriage and tried to gaslight you into believing you agreed to it. That’s not memory loss, that’s manipulation. When reality keeps “getting blurry,” it’s because someone is actively distorting it.
    And here’s the hardest truth: staying with someone because you’re scared of being alone is how people destroy their lives. Marriage will not fix your loneliness. It will lock you into it legally, financially, and emotionally with someone whose incentives are not clean.

    in reply to: Dating and kids #51246
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You already know the answer, you’re just hoping someone will permit you to ignore it.
    Yes. You cut it off. Completely.

    This man is not a partner. He was sleeping with other women, wanted to keep you on the side, and now he’s using your kids as a bridge to keep access to you. That’s not generosity. That’s leverage. And it’s dangerous.

    Your kids are not emotional bait. They are not consolation prizes. They are not tools for a grown man who can’t commit but still wants sexual access. The fact that you can see exactly what he’s doing and are still hesitating tells me you’re prioritizing short-term comfort over long-term damage.

    Here’s the part you need to hear clearly: letting a non-committed, sexually opportunistic man form a bond with your children when he has no stable role in their lives is irresponsible. Full stop. Kids attach. Kids don’t understand “casual.” When he disappears, and he will,l they pay the price, not you.

    And don’t lie to yourself by calling it “upsetting them.” What upsets kids is instability, inconsistency, and adults who come and go without explanation. You are allowing exactly that.
    He is not “still wanting sex.” He is testing boundaries, waiting you out, hoping you’ll weaken. Every interaction keeps the door cracked. He doesn’t respect you because you haven’t closed it.

    in reply to: I’m in love with her but is she in love with me? #51244
    Tara
    Member #382,680

    You’re not confused, you’re scared. And fear has parked you permanently in the friend zone.
    Seven years of friendship. Hanging out once every one or two months. You text more than she does. That already tells you the balance of interest, and it’s not in your favor. Long conversations don’t equal attraction. Comfort doesn’t equal desire. Shopping and talking for hours means she feels safe with you, not pulled toward you.

    Her birthday message wasn’t a love signal. It wasa polite appreciation. “Glad our relationship became more than activity friends” still lands squarely in emotional companionship, not romance. If she were romantically interested, you wouldn’t be guessing after months; you’d feel it in her effort, frequency, and initiative. You don’t.
    Here’s the harsh part: by staying silent to “not lose the relationship,”

    you’re already losing. You’re investing emotionally while pretending you’re fine with crumbs. That’s not loyalty, that’s self-betrayal. And the longer you wait, the more cemented your role becomes as the safe, non-threatening guy she enjoys occasionally.

    You’re worried about not being handsome enough. That insecurity is leaking into your behavior and keeping you passive. Attraction doesn’t reward hesitation. It punishes it.

    So here’s the only move that isn’t pathetic: you tell her directly that you’re interested in her as more than a friend and ask if she feels the same. No speeches. No disclaimers. No apology. If she says no, you don’t negotiate friendship terms; you step back and reclaim your dignity. If she says yes, great. Either way, the uncertainty dies.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 762 total)